3 Myths of BIM (for Constructors)

With the recent installation of BIM modeling programs after the US government issued their National BIM Standard and the United Kingdom set a mandate for BIM modeling, many construction offices and even a few star struck designers are beginning to see the underlying myths of a building information model (BIM). Most are finding the experience “a cautionary tale of virtual design and construction,” along with many more examples illustrating how BIM is far from the panacea claimed by software providers and their bureaucratic partners.



Myth 1: BIM is Easy

Many of those who think BIM modeling is easy to put into practice in a design or construction office have been blinded by the hype of clever marketing. The truth is, that other than standard (and colorful) objects like columns, beams, and simple gridlines, the real work of documenting a building’s construction is either quietly ignored or passed on to some unwitting subcontractor as part of a bid proposal.



It also doesn’t take long to find that the hardware required to run a BIM program is well beyond the average desktop computer. In addition, the software is myopically tedious and labor intensive, requiring suites of specialized add-ons with mind boggling menus of objects as product placements. This complexity means any hope of successfully extracting information from a model requires a highly proficient operator, a lot of time and money, and a hands-on journeyman level of expertise in building systems installations.

Of course, the very idea of a collaborative approach to coordinating building systems is lost on project executives who have neither the time nor the practical knowledge necessary to teach a CAD operator how to build an installation exactly as it will be placed in the field. No BIM model can anticipate variables of cash flow, scheduling, weather, materials, and the availability of busy subcontractors.


In other words, except for the assembly of a straightforward structural frame or the combination of standard engineered equipment, any potential conflict or interference that might be detected by BIM software depends completely on the construction and modeling expertise of people who know little about bending, welding, or hanging the pieces of a building in the real-world.

Myth 2: BIM is Automatic

Unlike a machined part, a building is an assembly of diverse and interrelated pieces, separated by different trades, expertise, criteria, and rules of thumb. No amount of office collaboration will match the hour to hour decisions made by construction superintendents, foremen/women, and leads on the jobsite.



In the office, the quixotic challenge is to layer two and three-dimensional visual information into a BIM model, while coordinating cross references, sequencing output, and accommodating last minute changes. All with a constantly shifting team of isolated CAD operators. This means the very idea that a technician can simply extract a 2D construction drawing with a straightforward Export command, ignores the frustration that all too often accompanies almost every task that includes a computer. Something always seems to go wrong.

This means, the promise of BIM modeling requires technical skill to operate the software, construction skills necessary to build the model, drafting skills to pick up corrections and changes, and a mind numbing focus on the intricacies of layering useful information into the model’s construction. 2D output must then be manually plotted along with stock specifications and details into a well referenced set of paper-based documents and material lists.



To do this successfully, IT managers must also maintain the technology with constant upgrades, backups, repairs, comprehensive and continuous training, and a collection of proprietary tricks, key codes, and macros that work around long and often convoluted command structures.

Myth 3: BIM is Useful

And after all this extra work, the resulting model file is completely useless to long term facilities management after one or two generations of software upgrades. In fact, the very idea that a facility manager has the time, personnel, or budget, to keep up with the hardware and software necessary to use a BIM model stems from even more imaginative marketing.

First, because even the exact same workstations used to produce the exact BIM model is actually rapidly going out of date as the model is being built. In other words, once the model is finished, funded, put out to bid, and finally gets into the field as part of a contract, it has already been outdated by technical advances in the hardware and software. Everyone knows these programs are constantly evolving: debugged, tweaked, or abandoned simply to encourage sales of new versions. That’s a fundamental truth in the computer industry.



This means the “saved” files downloaded from the original equipment are nothing more than a volatile mix of soon to be antiquated media. Anyone who remembers a cartridge recorder, floppy disk drive, or zip-drive knows it’s just a matter of time before the data on CD/DVDs, hard-drives, solid state, and cloud storage will no longer be useful for future computer devices.

To some the solution may seem to be to keep early software purchases on older computers and maintain proficiency on backwater versions of the program.



But the personnel capable of operating these antiquated workstations efficiently are also volatile. First because a vacation, temporary assignment, or unemployment will reduces proficiency within weeks. In addition, competitive CAD technicians must job-hop to better software or workstations if they sense their current equipment is becoming out of date. They cannot afford to be left behind in a rapidly evolving industry. And those that do stick around are often burned out by boredom and dissatisfaction, having lost the will to keep pace with the treadmill because of years of utter frustration.




The Solution is Simple

The solution to the failures of BIM modeling is a 3D information management tool that does not require a lot of updates or changes, is free for the asking, and doesn’t require a CAD technician to operate. If communication and collaboration is the key to more efficient construction information modeling, what the construction industry needs is a simple, universal, and transparent 3D program that anyone can use on any computer. That’s Google SketchUp – which wouldn’t be FREE without Google.

Mark Carvalho, an early “voice” in 3D modeling software, once articulated a vision for SketchUp as a universal visual-communications tool; one that comes close to being the PDF of 3D modeling. His view was based on the philosophy of Brad Schell, the founder of SketchUp, and the original start-up team’s company motto: "3D for Everyone."



See The Daily CatchUp

Brad envisioned a software program that would match the feel and freedom of working with pen and paper using a simple interface, easy to learn, allowing people to play with ideas in three-dimensions after a few minutes of practice (See Wikipedia). In this way, models could be used to document constructions, simulate sequence and process, communicate alternatives, and be useful to anyone with the click of a mouse or a tap and pinch of the fingers.

A 21st Century Okoshi-ezu

Medieval contractors used three-dimensional construction models called “okoshi-ezu” in the early 1600’s to build elegant teahouses. The okoshi-ezu were not design models, they were origami like pop-ups of 2D drawings, annotated with dimensions, details, and descriptions just like any other construction drawing.



These were very early multidimensional construction documents, viewed as a series of pages in a set of 2D working drawings and at the same time folded into three-dimensional construction models in order to visually communicate the details of the completed building.

Two dimensions of 3D

In a modern interpretation of the okoshi-ezu, simple 3D modeling programs of the 21^st C can and are being used by a generation of technically oriented constructors to capture 2D and 3D images that can be quickly added to purchase orders as a shop drawing, or as a diagram of a solution in a RFQ, field bulletin, or change order.




The trick to drawing with any 3D modeling program space is to keep in mind that a 2D drawing is nothing more than a collection of lines, notes, and dimensions on any two-dimensional plane in the three-dimensional environment.



http://insitebuilders.com/Blog110715/02-InTheMachine3d.jpeg

All one has to do is orient the drawing to a fixed and flat point of view -- anywhere in the construction model.

Drawing on a 2D plane

For example, in a program like SketchUp, select Parallel Projection in the Camera menu to flatten the image and eliminate perspective, then use the Camera menu to select one of the standard top or side views.

Next, pan and zoom your view point to an open space somewhere in or on the model that’s large enough for the image you want to draw. Once the location is set, use the Scenes dialog box to add and name it as a Scene.



Now all that remains is to use the Line, Oval, and Text tools along with inferences and guidelines, to draft the detail on the two-dimensional surface. Since the drawing is literally built at full size, there’s no need for rulers and scale calculations. Printed scales are controlled by the SketchUp program in the Print dialog box.



2D from a 3D construction model

A 3D construction model can also be used to capture two-dimensional plans, elevations, and sections.

2D Elevations

To do this, keep in mind that 2D building elevations are no more than parallel projections of one of the standard views around the outside (or inside) of the model.

To capture these projections, use the Camera menu again to position a preset standard view. Select Parallel Projections. Then adjust the shade and shadow controls to add depth. Shade and shadow might also be turned off completely to eliminate shading that might be distracting.


Once the image is ready, notes, projection lines, and dimensions are added and grouped on a common layer so that their visibility can be controlled or hidden with the Scene’s specific properties. The size of the model in the display is again not important since scaling will be calculated in the Print dialog box.

2D Floor Plan

Use the same technique to cut horizontal sections through the model as 2D floor plans. Start by selecting the Parallel Projection and the standard Top View settings in the Camera menu. Place the section plane through the window’s waist line with the Section tool so that it includes the wall openings.




Zoom and Pan to set the Camera’s point of view for the floor plan, then annotate and dimension the plan on a separate layer, or group in the Outliner, in order to control their visibility from scene to scene. Finally, click to add and name the floor plan in the Scene dialog box, making sure to set Scene Properties so that notes and dimensions are only visible in this one scene.



2D Building Sections

Cutting a vertical section is a lot like cutting a cake. In SketchUp you can extract a 2D outline of the profile of the cut at the section plane, but it’s far better to contextualize the section by keeping objects beyond the plane in place to add depth to the two-dimensional view. In SketchUp you can also add shade and shadow, along with Fog and Edge Style and Depth Cue to strengthen the image and adjust the section’s profile – but it’s really not necessary for a working drawing.




3D in 2D

The result of these simple 2d tricks is a collection of drawings as a series of two dimensional scenes. Each scene can then be printed to scale as a single plate or a page in a set of construction drawings. The scenes can also be exported as low-resolution 2D graphics to be cut and pasted into a memorandum, field document, or as part of a larger sheet in a Draw program.

The scenes could even be reassembled and folded into a three-dimensional model – just like an okoshei-ezu.

------

If you’re interested, most of these techniques are detailed in our books on construction modeling. See especially, Mastering the Art of 3D Construction Modeling, 2011.

For an introduction to SketchUp, see the tutorials and forums at SketchUcation.com

You Tube links: Setting up Scenes, Cutting Sections, Exporting 2D Graphics.

.

Medieval 3D Construction Models

In 16^th C Japan, the need for a new kind of construction drawing emerged with the proliferation of teahouse construction. These new documents were necessary because sanctions, based on the generational secrets of a rigid class-trade structure, meant mainstream Japanese architecture followed an empirically controlled system of building construction.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_architecture

Three-dimensional construction drawings
At the same time, variations in private teahouse construction created an opportunity for many builders. These structures required special attention to detail to satisfy owner expectations.


Hiroshi Sakaguchi, Master Carpenter’, Ki Arts

However, the demands of customization meant it was important to document both intent and process to elite owners in order to avoid the shame a poorly executed project would bring to the honor of its builder.

Okoshu-ezu
In response to the need for a detailed document to control the production process, Japanese master carpenters began using a construction drawing called an “okoshu-ezu.”

Pages scanned from "What is Japanese Architecture" (Amazon)

 

An okoshu-ezu is a folded drawing that can be opened into a three-dimensional construction model. Many were animated with pop-ups using origami techniques to explain special features in the construction. Specifications for alcoves, posts and lintels were written directly on the folded pages, with cut outs for steps, floors, and shutters glued onto the model’s surfaces.

Pages scanned from "What is Japanese Architecture" (Amazon)

Instructions were drawn on both side of the folded paper so that shelves, alcoves, shojis, hardware, and wall finishes were visible in direct relationship to the opposite side of the wall. Penetrations like crawl doors and shoji screened openings were then seen from both the inside and the outside of a wall at the same time.

Three dimensional construction communication
Okoshu-ezu were drawn by scribes to layout and communicate the details of the construction for both craftsmen and influential owners. Important is that their purpose was not to visualize the design, but to communicate the requirements of the construction.

As such, they were carried by masterbuilders in the field along with a measuring stick and plumb-level. These were the tools of early construction managers.


Pages scanned from "What is Japanese Architecture" (Amazon)

On the jobsite the drawings could be referenced as individual pages by viewing the folded pages. But the pages could also be unfolded into a three-dimensional form to contextualize a particular detail or special instructions.

Three dimensional construction information
In practice, an okoshu-ezu is not much different from the construction models used today. Assembled in three-dimensions by experienced builders, construction models lay flat in a file-pocket ready for access, viewable in two-dimensions using defined view points, and easily annotated with notes and links to contextualize the information in 3D.


http://insitebuilders.com

The only difference is how simple it has become to create a functional three-dimensional information model. Using simple 3D modelers like SketchUp and virtual construction methods like those found in books like “Mastering the Art of 3D Construction Modeling,” modern builders now have a dynamic and versatile tool to use in a new era of construction management.



.

The View from Flatland

Technologies like Twitter and Facebook are beginning to demonstrate the potential of social media for construction and construction management. This began with some construction companies promoting their services with photographs and marketing material, but has recently evolved into a new set of tools for construction management. Tools that add a social dimension to project-based information.

What’s interesting is that this new dimension sets up a casual relationship between production teams and project owners as a “community” of mutual interests. The result is a computer mediated space where a stream of informal posts add a deeper understanding of the day to day challenges faced on the jobsite. For example, take a look at the website for Pentland Homes, Oehlberg Construction, and Lyons Sitework.

Though content differs for these companies, what comes across in the postings, comments, and “like-clicks” is a community of interests centered on not only a particular project, but the concerns of the company’s managers. In other words, what we see are the social values associated with their work. These are the same values that are usually buried by formal transactions commonly found in construction communications.

Flatland
Recognizing the value of these social associations to construction is a lot like seeing into the reality of the one and two-dimensional worlds described in the book, Flatland by Edwin Abbott, 1884.

In this book, women are lines while men are segmented polygons. However, when viewed along their one dimensional edges both line and polygon appear the same. It takes the invasion of a three-dimensional sphere to even suggest that there may be a dimension beyond the flattened world-view of a single dimension.

While the narrator in the book (a square) struggles to explain a second dimension where both line and polygon can be seen for what they are, it takes the invasion of a three-dimensional sphere into Flatland to expose the limits of their narrowly defined perceptive understandings. But even as the sphere clearly demonstrates the limitations of 2D by introducing the spatial superiority of 3D, the sphere refuses to consider the logical assumption that there must be yet another dimension beyond its own.

As a social commentary, Abbott goes beyond structured dimensional consciousness into a allegory on social order and class based prejudices. For construction communications, what he points to is the difficulty of changing immediate and long held perceptions of the way things ought-to-be, in order to recognize the potentials that come from new dimensional insights.

The 4D Doodler
In the same way, Ralph Waldeyer writes of the complexity of multidimensional experiences. In his book, The 4-D Doodler, 1941, he describes the confusions and misunderstandings that his characters experience as they slip in and out of a fourth dimension. As they are pulled in and out of the spatial warps of 4D, their understandings are clearly bound by the limits of their own three-dimensional experiences.

For them, 4D is something to be feared and avoided. Waldeyer describes how each one of his characters struggles in different ways to deal with being partially or wholly in and out of a different dimension. His lesson is that it’s quite possible for objects to exist in more than one dimension at the same time. Their only limitation is their inherent ability to deal with these multidimensional world views.

Push Pop Press
The ideas illustrated in these books show how dimensional change disrupts our response to new perceptions. This includes the challenges faced in simply recognizing the potential of these alternate dimensions. For example take a look at Mike Matas’ presentation at a recent TED conference on the next-generation digital book.

Though the book is said to be the number one book on ITunes, in the end its really not much more than an imaginative interactive website viewed on an Iphone or Ipad. What’s important is that Matas points to the potential of a multidimensional communications tool that requires the same perceptual shift suggested in Flatland and The 4D Doodler.

For those locked in a traditional way of doing business, the very notion of another dimension remains somehow tightly held by higher, more mysterious powers. This means the transparencies of social media and the capacity of the web to deliver deeper levels of graphical information, raise both fear and frustration as new dimensions disrupt long standing traditions of construction management. Traditions that are rapidly changing in a new age of hypergraphic construction communications.
.

Design vs Construction Modeling

If you’re beginning to think SketchUp has some potential for construction management, you should take a look at the SketchUcation website.  The communities surrounding the user forums on this site are at the core of the SketchUp community and one of the most important resources for construction modeling.

SketchUcation

You can click around the forums and tutorials before you join, but to search topics for help or to download components and plug-ins, you need to register to participate and post.



Once inside the forums and links, you’ll find every possible SketchUp resource as well as answers to (almost) any questions you might have about SketchUp.  The SketchUcation forums and content make this website an essential modeling resource.

One thing that becomes almost immediately clear is that the SketchUcation website is dominated by designers, which means most of the model exchanges and discussions center around what makes the program work as a colorful and photo-realistic predesign tool.



You’ll also quickly discover that design-oriented users, by Google strategy or neglect, pretty much define the modeling program.  This includes a development team with limited industry experience that drives the program to become even more narrowly focused as a design tool.  In other words, you won’t find a lot about process, production, or construction modeling unless you dig deep into the SketchUcation forums.

Design is color and style

At the same time, no where is the contrast between construction and design more clearly demonstrated than on the pages of the CatchUp – SketchUcation Community News where we’ve recently started the first in a series of articles on construction modeling.

An interesting thing occurred with the second issue of their online magazine.  As you flip through the pages of the e-magazine, the layouts and the quality of the graphic design are really impressive.  But look at the last page and the first part of a long (long) series of short tutorials on how to build a little house as a SketchUp construction model.

The juxtaposition of our unembellished, black and white format and the stylistic and design oriented images in the rest of the magazine, brings the difference between construction and design modeling clearly into focus.



Production and process

The contrast in the look and feel of these pages illustrates the difference between design and construction modeling.  Like many outside of design, only a few construction managers care about color and style, except how it might be specified in the construction documents.  Instead most want to communicate intent or process and the cold hard facts associated with getting a building built.

In this way, the contrast is a graphic representation of two different worlds.  One uses models to introduce or sell a design product with color and imaginative style.  While the other uses three-dimensional models to visually manage the materials, labor, equipment and tools necessary to produce that product.



Construction models are built to communicate construction and not design.  The emphasis is therefore on models that can be quickly staged, annotated, emailed, posted, exported, printed, or faxed in minutes by anyone as fast, simple explanations.  The models are used to generate graphic explanations, visually simple, black and white, with the focus on process and production.

Simple, fast, and repetitive assemblies

This means construction models are faster to generate than design models.  As such, they are assemblies, nested and organized by the SketchUp Outliner, and based on a library of prefabricated pieces saved from all previous constructions.



The model combines a scaled site setup and wire frames as component rigs on which to align and join previously fabricated pieces and subassemblies.  When these pieces are saved from models of the same building type, almost anything can be quickly reassembled from what is basically a proprietary kit of parts.  The only skill that is really required is to actually understand how the building is put together.

For construction communications, the completed assembly represents the process embedded in the result.  This is not a static picture of a construction.  The SketchUp Outliner, layers, and scenes are therefore used to control sequence illustrations or animations in order to dynamically communicate particular details or problems, test preconstruction assumptions, and simulate activities in order to analyze specific concerns.



The result looks nothing like a design model.  Images extracted from the model are visual explanations, generated on-the-fly, delivered as illustrated contractual documents, representing nothing more that what is necessary to communicate a production process.

.

Visual Construction Management

I used to remind my students that the biggest mistake they can make as a construction manager is to formally submit a problem or question from the jobsite without having any idea about what to do for a solution. As such, their question remains open-ended, and more importantly, the answer to the problem waits for the unexpected.

Leading questions
Construction managers should control the process. And just like the carefully practiced “closing statements” sales people are trained to use in product pitches, the only way to seal a deal and keep things moving along is to ask definitive and leading questions. Preferably with a yes or no answer.


      

For old timers, this was tough. Few had time to sit down and type out a detailed description of the problem, let alone think about offering a solution. And even fewer could support their submittals with drawings and estimates to illustrate the best possible direction.

Instead, most construction managers were forced to “work around” the problem while they waited for further instructions – often disrupting the schedule, adding to potential delays and overruns, while control drifted away from construction managers to others who may be less familiar with conditions on the jobsite.




Visual explanations
Of course, the best way to keep a project on schedule is to know exactly how you plan to maintain its paths and dependencies. That requires practical explanations and detailed directions. And the best way to clearly explain a solution to a problem is with an illustration. After all, most solutions eventually return to the jobsite as a detailed drawing anyway.

At the same time, only a few construction managers are trained to draft or draw. And even when they are, as in one of my graphic communications classes, only a handful are really interested in perfecting their “artistic” techniques.

Automated drawings
But now, with free and simple modeling programs like Google SketchUp, construction managers are able to use 3D models to illustrate their own ideas. For them, it’s easier to build than to draw and there’s something about putting pieces together to build a drawing, even in a virtualized 3D world, that speaks to many contemporary constructors.



And as it turns out, even architects and engineers use 3D models to draft their drawings. Designers now extract plans, sections, and details from three-dimensional building information models (BIMs). This means where 2D CAD programs once replaced hand-drafting, we now see these BIM models replacing computer drafting.

2D from 3D
BIMs are not as simple as they’re sold, but they are changing the way 2D drawings are produced. Gone are the days when it took a great deal of skill to meticulously craft a 2D drawing. Instead, designers now struggle with obscure codes and menu selections to generate complicated layers of information that go well beyond simple explanations, way too much trouble for most constructors.

Instead, with easy to learn 3D modelers like Google SketchUp, multiple solutions and detailed illustrations can be quickly assembled and exported as scenes from a simple construction model.



For example, Bonnie Roskes’ updated book combines Google Sketchup with Layout 3 to show how 3D models can be quickly converted into two-dimensional illustrations.

Though the content of Bonnie’s book goes well beyond extracting drawings, the method is almost exactly the same as taking a photograph on a virtual jobsite and attaching the image to the submittal with a paper clip.

1. Start by building the 3D model,
2. Use camera tools to position a point of view,
3. Click to export the image for annotation
4. Print or cut and paste the result.

Leading illustrations
This means anyone, even a hands-on-died-in-the-wool contractor can quickly illustrate any number of ideas and present them as suggested solutions in support of a leading question.

Even more important is that construction models used to stage these illustrations are piece-based assemblies of the suggested solution. The model therefore represents an embedded process. It can be deconstructed, reconstructed, and even animated to simulate the operational conditions that can lead the project team to a timely solution.




After all, even a rejected solution is a management tool. As value engineers from many different industries remind us, in a “systematic and structured functional analysis, rejected ideas generate alternatives and new directions.” It’s called brainstorming.

Visual construction management
In the end, visually supported explanations support a higher and more proactive level of competitive construction management. Where once a manager might avoid taking this level of control of their projects, many are beginning to understand that with an open and transparent communications based economy, they can bring definitive technical insight and expertise to a team of like-minded project professionals.



And their message becomes especially powerful when they can represent their ideas with graphical skills that were once reserved for designers. A new generation of constructors now manage their projects with clearly illustrated leading questions that best serve their commitment to maintaining control of the project schedule.

.

Mastering the Art of 3D Construction Modeling

.

We just finished an update to our classic book, 3D Construction Modeling. 

www.insitebuilders.com

The new book was written for project managers who want to learn first hand how to build their own piece based construction models.  A construction model is a process model, built to communicate ideas and illustrate details using a deconstructable assembly of accurately scaled groups and components. 

In other words, a construction model is specifically built to be assembled, disassembled, and staged to communicate the means and methods of a construction.  As such, it is not a design tool, it is a communications tool.

So simple a child can do it 

The key to fast and simple construction modeling is an open-source 3D program like Google SketchUp.  As advertised, the software is so easy that a child can use it.  And though that’s a true statement, most of us know that doesn’t necessarily mean it’ll be easy for a project manager to learn to use the program in the real-world of construction. 

http://sketchup.google.com/

But all it really takes to master the art of construction modeling are a few tips and tricks, a little practice, and the motivation to put the program to work. 

That’s the objective of this book:

1. Pass on tips and tricks collected over almost a decade of construction modeling
2. Animate the modeling process with a series of short video tutorials
3. Demonstrate what models can do for professional construction communication

Graphical indexes

The book blends annotated illustrations, short videos, models, and tips and tricks into a series of graphical indexes.  

First as a content page that looks a lot like a standard work breakdown structure (WBS) with eight construction phases.

The WBS thumbnails link to a series of video indexes on the book’s CD and are included in the book’s table of contents as an overview of each chapter.  These chapter indexes link to a series of 74 short video explanations of the virtual construction.

The chapters themselves include 54 quick tips and tricks to support the video tutorials.  The tips and tricks are simple techniques that help to speed model construction. 

.

The pages of the book act as a graphical index of the tutorials.  As such they illustrate the content of each of the video tutorials, introducing techniques that may already be understood, leaving the user to decide the relevance of each step in the modeling method and the corresponding tutorial, based on their experience with the program.

The video pages linked from the graphical index on the book’s CD include embedded YouTube links and full size Flash animations that cover the details of the printed illustrations.  We include these videos on the CD as pop-ups along with resources and cross references to the programs, tutorials, checklists, models, and files used for each phase of the construction model.

.

The book’s CD also includes all the models used to illustrate the book, plus the Insitebuilders Shortcuts data file, Insitebuilders Template file, and 154 components taken from the much larger Insitebuilders Component Library.  The rest of our collection can be found in the models included with our other books (Building SIMPLE, Being SUSTAINABLE, How a House is Built, and How to Plan, Permit, and Pay for a Small Home of Your Own).

 

Components are an important part of fast-track construction modeling.  No piece of a construction model needs to be built or supply-sourced more than once.  Just like the real world, each model draws on the experience and resources that worked on a previous project and every new construction begins with a collection of components that have been built before.

This means a construction model is no more than a quick assembly from a known collection of prefabricated parts.  The tutorials in this book demonstrate this collective method of modeling using a combination of a fast fabrication technique to build and update new components. 

This includes a detailed look at the Outliner and how it keeps the pieces of the model organized, making it possible to stage illustrations, organize deconstructions, and animate sequences of production.  The Outliner also formats components so that they can be quantified and linked to cloud sourced documents like spreadsheets, slide presentations, and reports.  

At the center of a cloud

The book therefore mixes digitally printed illustrations and annotated graphics captured from SketchUp, video explanations and sample models, along with YouTube and Flash videos, pop-ups, web pages, checklists, spreadsheets, slide shows, and text based PDFs.  

www.SourceForge.net

Most important, the entire book was produced using a combination of open-source and freely available programs downloaded from a cloud of similar programs, including Google SketchUp, Earth, Maps, Docs, PickPic, KompoZer, VirtualDub, FastStone, PDF Fill, Scribus, and the Wink animator. 

For more details on all our books, visit our website at www.insitebuilders.com.  

.

.